<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Afghanistan: Aid spike is over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over</link>
	<description>The FPA Global Affairs Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: unsecured bad</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>unsecured bad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 22:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>hey :-)
its very unconventional point of view.
Good post.
realy good post

thx :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey :-)<br />
its very unconventional point of view.<br />
Good post.<br />
realy good post</p>
<p>thx :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bboyd</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2746</link>
		<dc:creator>bboyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2746</guid>
		<description>Dear Peter,
Yes, I also saw that great article at Afghanistanica .  [Note to readers: see http://afghanistanica.com/2007/08/05/afghanistan-is-sort-of-irrelevant/#comments  ].

Everything you said is just so, woefully, true.

Thanks for writing in and for all the support.  We Afghanistan-watchers have to stick together. . .

Bonnie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Peter,<br />
Yes, I also saw that great article at Afghanistanica .  [Note to readers: see <a href="http://afghanistanica.com/2007/08/05/afghanistan-is-sort-of-irrelevant/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://afghanistanica.com/2007/08/05/afghanistan-is-sort-of-irrelevant/#comments</a>  ].</p>
<p>Everything you said is just so, woefully, true.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing in and for all the support.  We Afghanistan-watchers have to stick together. . .</p>
<p>Bonnie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P&#233;ter</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>P&#233;ter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Dear Bonnie, Josh,
For people regularly blogging on Afghanistan this is a bit like having one&#039;s nose rubbed in the dirt, actually, isn&#039;t it? Not altogether unexpected, but still...
This reminds me, C over at Afghanistanica has, somewhat coincidentally it seems to me, just the other day accounted of having had two hours of free time getting away from the particular intensive language course he&#039;s attending, obviously with Afghanistan on his mind... And just look at the post he&#039;s written in that spare time he found, and his concluding remarks.
As to whether this is &#039;angling for failure&#039; (I think I&#039;m literally quoting from a past post of yours on the issue here, Josh)... Well, certainly this all is not about angling for some big success in Afghanistan. And that already is astonishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Bonnie, Josh,<br />
For people regularly blogging on Afghanistan this is a bit like having one&#39;s nose rubbed in the dirt, actually, isn&#39;t it? Not altogether unexpected, but still&#8230;<br />
This reminds me, C over at Afghanistanica has, somewhat coincidentally it seems to me, just the other day accounted of having had two hours of free time getting away from the particular intensive language course he&#39;s attending, obviously with Afghanistan on his mind&#8230; And just look at the post he&#39;s written in that spare time he found, and his concluding remarks.<br />
As to whether this is &#8216;angling for failure&#8217; (I think I&#8217;m literally quoting from a past post of yours on the issue here, Josh)&#8230; Well, certainly this all is not about angling for some big success in Afghanistan. And that already is astonishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; Afghanistan: Six years on</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2744</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; Afghanistan: Six years on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 19:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2744</guid>
		<description>[...] Six years after its invasion of Afghanistan, the United States has announced it will curb aid to the war-torn country. Bonnie Boyd thinks this does not make much sense at all; and Joshua Foust again disagrees with The Economist, arguing that things in Afghanistan are not as bad as they have been for much of the past thirty years.   Share This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Six years after its invasion of Afghanistan, the United States has announced it will curb aid to the war-torn country. Bonnie Boyd thinks this does not make much sense at all; and Joshua Foust again disagrees with The Economist, arguing that things in Afghanistan are not as bad as they have been for much of the past thirty years.   Share This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Foust</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Foust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 18:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://centralasia.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2007/08/06/afghanistan-aid-spike-is-over/#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>Seriously. I&#039;ve been carping for years about how stupid our underinvestment in Afghanistan is. In the Peter Bergen article you linked a few days ago, he mentioned it is the lowest investment in post-conflict stability since WWII, and dwarfed by the Balkans... to say nothing of the fact that Iraq gets in about a month what Afghanistan gets in an entire year.

Sometimes I do wonder if the U.S. government really wants Afghanistan to fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously. I&#8217;ve been carping for years about how stupid our underinvestment in Afghanistan is. In the Peter Bergen article you linked a few days ago, he mentioned it is the lowest investment in post-conflict stability since WWII, and dwarfed by the Balkans&#8230; to say nothing of the fact that Iraq gets in about a month what Afghanistan gets in an entire year.</p>
<p>Sometimes I do wonder if the U.S. government really wants Afghanistan to fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: d039a00e098d7cf3cbc7324bf0f7f6e2
Cache created: 08-02-2012 22:07:47
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 0.14(5)
-->
