<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Child Porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=virtual-child-porn</link>
	<description>The FPA Global Affairs Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:49:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: AM</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/#comment-32850</link>
		<dc:creator>AM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://children.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/31/virtual-child-porn/#comment-32850</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re going back to video games and questions about whether allowing people to kill, maim &amp; hurt each other in virtual reality is OK. 
People might like to play out their sexual fantasies in virtual reality - and this may involved dangerous fetishes, rape fantasies etc, and we have no means to asses that somebody would be tempted to commit the crime in real life - excellent example is Japan where all kinds of disturbing porn originate and is widely available, yet the number of rapes is very low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re going back to video games and questions about whether allowing people to kill, maim &amp; hurt each other in virtual reality is OK.<br />
People might like to play out their sexual fantasies in virtual reality &#8211; and this may involved dangerous fetishes, rape fantasies etc, and we have no means to asses that somebody would be tempted to commit the crime in real life &#8211; excellent example is Japan where all kinds of disturbing porn originate and is widely available, yet the number of rapes is very low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Pincombe</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/#comment-21019</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Pincombe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://children.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/31/virtual-child-porn/#comment-21019</guid>
		<description>Virtual Child Porn comes in many different forms &amp; uses many different devices to seduce the user to view the product. There are many that use images of younger looking girls to attract viewers to Adult Webs featuring girls over 18. But the most discusting deviation from this is to use legal 18 year old teen websites &amp; link pages to induce young guys to look at very young girls &amp; very young teens being sexually abused. An eighteen year old boy would not think it unusual for a girl of fourteen to be in a sexual position as he would have seen quite a few in the years leading up to his eightreenth year. The problem he has is he probably doesn&#039;t know it is ilegal. the arrest of quite a few young men for viewing child porn (under 26) tells me that they have no idea about the law. I find the practice of perporting to represent legal teen porn &amp; then giving links to Child Porn Sites disgusting &amp; ingenuous of the porn providers. 

The trouble is most of the porn ptoviders are from the Eastern Block &amp; they provide porn from Grandmother/Grandfather to Baby girl/boy &amp; sometimes a mix of the two. To them it is money &amp; they don&#039;t care who procides it to them they will put it on the net &amp; get paid. One Child Porn site boasted 2.8 million viewers in one day, fuck!!! There is 6.8 billion people in the world at most. If even 5% of the world were paedophiles that would be 340 million in the world. The problem with that scenario doesn&#039;t take into account that only about a quarter of the world is on the internet. So the pool would be 1.7 billion &amp; 5% of that is 85 million paedophiles in the world using &amp; posting on the net. That is frightening but the fact is most paedophiles come in different categories &amp; some never have produced or shown child porn to anyone. About half of the 85 million paedophiles have never posted on the net so that leaves about 43 million out there looking and posting/sharing on the net.

2.8 million in one day onone site is frightening but some of it can be explained by sucking in young men who don&#039;t think this stuff is illegal as they only look at the young teen girls that interest them &amp; in many countries a girl over 14 is fair game for sex or for porn. It is the under 14 that is the real worry even though the young teens are worrysome the children are even more so because of the age they seem to start them, as BABIES!!!
Some thing should be sacred &amp; a babies&#039; ability to feel safe is one of those &amp; a childs security one of those givens a parent if not a pervert would die to protect. A teen should grow into their sexuality in their own time without being pushed &amp; prodded &amp; definitely not by someone much older.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtual Child Porn comes in many different forms &amp; uses many different devices to seduce the user to view the product. There are many that use images of younger looking girls to attract viewers to Adult Webs featuring girls over 18. But the most discusting deviation from this is to use legal 18 year old teen websites &amp; link pages to induce young guys to look at very young girls &amp; very young teens being sexually abused. An eighteen year old boy would not think it unusual for a girl of fourteen to be in a sexual position as he would have seen quite a few in the years leading up to his eightreenth year. The problem he has is he probably doesn&#8217;t know it is ilegal. the arrest of quite a few young men for viewing child porn (under 26) tells me that they have no idea about the law. I find the practice of perporting to represent legal teen porn &amp; then giving links to Child Porn Sites disgusting &amp; ingenuous of the porn providers. </p>
<p>The trouble is most of the porn ptoviders are from the Eastern Block &amp; they provide porn from Grandmother/Grandfather to Baby girl/boy &amp; sometimes a mix of the two. To them it is money &amp; they don&#8217;t care who procides it to them they will put it on the net &amp; get paid. One Child Porn site boasted 2.8 million viewers in one day, fuck!!! There is 6.8 billion people in the world at most. If even 5% of the world were paedophiles that would be 340 million in the world. The problem with that scenario doesn&#8217;t take into account that only about a quarter of the world is on the internet. So the pool would be 1.7 billion &amp; 5% of that is 85 million paedophiles in the world using &amp; posting on the net. That is frightening but the fact is most paedophiles come in different categories &amp; some never have produced or shown child porn to anyone. About half of the 85 million paedophiles have never posted on the net so that leaves about 43 million out there looking and posting/sharing on the net.</p>
<p>2.8 million in one day onone site is frightening but some of it can be explained by sucking in young men who don&#8217;t think this stuff is illegal as they only look at the young teen girls that interest them &amp; in many countries a girl over 14 is fair game for sex or for porn. It is the under 14 that is the real worry even though the young teens are worrysome the children are even more so because of the age they seem to start them, as BABIES!!!<br />
Some thing should be sacred &amp; a babies&#8217; ability to feel safe is one of those &amp; a childs security one of those givens a parent if not a pervert would die to protect. A teen should grow into their sexuality in their own time without being pushed &amp; prodded &amp; definitely not by someone much older.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinker</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10613</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://children.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/31/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10613</guid>
		<description>What gets people turned on or not, is not something that can be changed.  Its the actions the people make that count in life.

People can claim anything about the causes for being attracted to someone(or thing), but that is not what is important.  I person can go through life never acting on there desires, IF THEY WANTED.  Nuns are a good example, they could &#039;act&#039; on there desires but they choose not too.  Now an intresting thing happens when you replace the word &quot;Nun&quot; with pedophile or homosexual.  This new phrase ether makes people feel the person should not be having those desires at all or homosexuality is nothing like being a pedophile.  Even though both refer to someones sexual desires and intrestinly only for a person who has ACTED on them.  How do you know that Nun you have no problem with is not a pedophile or homosexual, we dont unless they have acted on there desires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What gets people turned on or not, is not something that can be changed.  Its the actions the people make that count in life.</p>
<p>People can claim anything about the causes for being attracted to someone(or thing), but that is not what is important.  I person can go through life never acting on there desires, IF THEY WANTED.  Nuns are a good example, they could &#8216;act&#8217; on there desires but they choose not too.  Now an intresting thing happens when you replace the word &#8220;Nun&#8221; with pedophile or homosexual.  This new phrase ether makes people feel the person should not be having those desires at all or homosexuality is nothing like being a pedophile.  Even though both refer to someones sexual desires and intrestinly only for a person who has ACTED on them.  How do you know that Nun you have no problem with is not a pedophile or homosexual, we dont unless they have acted on there desires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10610</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://children.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/31/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10610</guid>
		<description>i think child porn is the worst there is coz it exploits the children</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think child porn is the worst there is coz it exploits the children</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ageplayer</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10607</link>
		<dc:creator>Ageplayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://children.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/31/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10607</guid>
		<description>Similar statements have been made that the availability and acceptance of pornography in general would lead to an increase in sex crimes, but the contemporary information age, in when the consumption of pornography is rampant, the reverse has been proven to be true. While not necessarily indicator of direct causality, sex crimes in this era have plummeted compared to previous ones in which explicit material was less available.

The United States is presently experiencing a witch-hunt for pedophiles, a term now expanded to include an interest in post-pubescent teens, which have only been made taboo through the twentieth century, though it is considered within the human sexuality sector natural and healthy for humans to be attracted to counterparts that are young and reproductively viable (fertile or virile) despite what specific age society determines is the minimum for consent. Technically, this puts the majority of American males in the category of pedophilia, when the sole disincentive for most men to approach a sixteen-year-old girl is the potential of jail time.

But just because child-fetishists are persecuted by the moral powers that be doesn&#039;t mean that we are necessarily predators, or have no concern for those that our pursuits, completely unchecked, could victimize. As with any other dangerous fetish, there are ways to express it without causing harm, from roleplay, to the production or consumption of literary fantasy, or that of artistic pornography, which includes that of virtual children.

Granted, Chris Hansen never seems to run out of material for *To Catch a Predator* (though, again, as above, these aggressors can hardly be regarded as pedophilic, pursuing post-pubescent adolescents that are below the age of consent), but even Hansen will occasionally acknowledge he&#039;s interested in snaring sexual predators, not merely folks who fetishize young people. The majority of us choose safe alternatives to engaging in non-consensual, hurtful behavior. And the more options in this category there are, the fewer of us will resort to alternatives that are outside it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar statements have been made that the availability and acceptance of pornography in general would lead to an increase in sex crimes, but the contemporary information age, in when the consumption of pornography is rampant, the reverse has been proven to be true. While not necessarily indicator of direct causality, sex crimes in this era have plummeted compared to previous ones in which explicit material was less available.</p>
<p>The United States is presently experiencing a witch-hunt for pedophiles, a term now expanded to include an interest in post-pubescent teens, which have only been made taboo through the twentieth century, though it is considered within the human sexuality sector natural and healthy for humans to be attracted to counterparts that are young and reproductively viable (fertile or virile) despite what specific age society determines is the minimum for consent. Technically, this puts the majority of American males in the category of pedophilia, when the sole disincentive for most men to approach a sixteen-year-old girl is the potential of jail time.</p>
<p>But just because child-fetishists are persecuted by the moral powers that be doesn&#8217;t mean that we are necessarily predators, or have no concern for those that our pursuits, completely unchecked, could victimize. As with any other dangerous fetish, there are ways to express it without causing harm, from roleplay, to the production or consumption of literary fantasy, or that of artistic pornography, which includes that of virtual children.</p>
<p>Granted, Chris Hansen never seems to run out of material for *To Catch a Predator* (though, again, as above, these aggressors can hardly be regarded as pedophilic, pursuing post-pubescent adolescents that are below the age of consent), but even Hansen will occasionally acknowledge he&#8217;s interested in snaring sexual predators, not merely folks who fetishize young people. The majority of us choose safe alternatives to engaging in non-consensual, hurtful behavior. And the more options in this category there are, the fewer of us will resort to alternatives that are outside it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hassan</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/30/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10603</link>
		<dc:creator>hassan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://children.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/01/31/virtual-child-porn/#comment-10603</guid>
		<description>wery good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wery good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Hyper cache file: 084ecc339e91f6ecc393151e490e5ef5
Cache created: 08-02-2012 13:00:34
HCE Version: 0.9.8
Load AVG: 0.85(5)
-->
