Comments on: Afghanistan/Pakistan Border – Pashtun Power

By: [BLOCKED BY STBV] Kensington b&bs

[BLOCKED BY STBV] Kensington b&bs — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:13:03 +0000

Kensington b…

Thank you very much for your information. This post is very useful to me as I am writing on London Hotels and accommodation in London generally. I would like to know if I can use part of your information for my project work….

By: Red Revolutionaries

Red Revolutionaries — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:34:03 +0000

i dont know what faust is trying to say?? but one thing is crystal clear what ever rubin said was true n if JM are repeating it why gettin so ridiculous???look i eve been to the tribal areas of pakistan…. they are living in conditions one cant even imagine..they are more like the subjects rather then the citizens of pakistan…the main problem is that of education….there is no education system so its very easy for those no matter whoever they are to brain wash the simple people over there…..pashtun was never a religious fanatic…u can look through history for it….

By: Afghanistan/Pakistan Border - Pashtun Power | Central Asia « euraktiva

Afghanistan/Pakistan Border - Pashtun Power | Central Asia « euraktiva — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 04:20:04 +0000

[...] Afghanistan/Pakistan Border – Pashtun Power | Central Asia Afghanistan/Pakistan Border – Pashtun Power | Central Asia. [...]

By: Central Asia » Blog Archive » CIA, ISI: Paranoia Party

Central Asia » Blog Archive » CIA, ISI: Paranoia Party — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:38:07 +0000

[...] Last week I went over two articles from journal International Security which both discussed the deteriorating security and governance situation along the Afghan/Pakistan border. Both articles emphasized Pakistan’s intelligence service, the ISI, as being either too weak, lacking decent effort, or of actually being a partner in some of the Taliban’s insurgent efforts against NATO and the Afghan government. In fact, both papers’ accusations were rather damning against the ISI. Combine this analysis and evidence along with a report by the New York Times today regarding a high level visit by the CIA and Joint Chief of Staff Adm. Mullen with Pakistan’s government leaders, where the US side outlined accusations against the ISI’s role in the insurgency. The CIA and US military specifically accused the ISI of having continual links with the militant network lead by Maulavi Jalaluddin Haqqani, who is known to have direct links to members of Al Qaeda. The article also discusses how Pakistan’s nascent civilian government was having a hard time asserting control over the intelligence agency. [...]

By: Central Asia » Blog Archive » Afghanistan: Obama, troops, and poppies

Central Asia » Blog Archive » Afghanistan: Obama, troops, and poppies — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:51:27 +0000

[...] I’m a couple days late, actually with the saturated media coverage it seems much longer, but Presidential candidate Barack Obama visited Afghanistan, meeting with US troops and the Afghan leadership. Reports stated that he made the trip to highlight the nation as the main front as the war on terror, more so than Iraq. I was pleased to hear that Obama visited, or at least flew over, the Pakistan-Afghan border where the insurgency is the strongest and where most NATO/US soldiers are dying. As I wrote last week this strategic area is of vital importance to US, regional, and international security and has been widely misunderstood by US officials and the media at large, so hopefully Obama was able to provide himself a clearer picture of the conflict by his visit (which I must say is about time, why did it take him this long to checkout the war-torn/vital nation? Well I’m at in this parantheses opinion piece, I have been also less than thrilled with Presidential candidate John McCain’s emphasis on Afghanistan, the public needs to know what the US/NATO/Afghan government is up against.) In positive news, Obama is reportedly going to ask Europe to ’shoulder more of the burden to help deal with global security threats’ in his upcoming Berlin speech. The global security threats definitely include Afghanistan and hopefully a fresh dialogue of NATO’s role can be opened. [...]

By: Joshua Foust

Joshua Foust — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:24:22 +0000

“Troy” at the blog Abu Muqawama already made this comparison:

http://abumuqawama.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-do-you-solve-problem-like-pashtun.html

He linked to someone named Stephen Pampinella trying to analyze these papers through “traditional social science approaches to violence and insurgency” and tries to tie it into Wendt's Social Theory:

http://stephenpampinella.wordpress.com/2008/06/22/deconstructing-the-taliban/

What neither post mentions, what you don't either, is that there are serious logical and methodological problems to the Johnson & Mason paper, which I documented here:

http://www.registan.net/index.php/2008/05/07/digging-deeper-into-the-pashtun-tribal-areas/

Also the Jones paper is essentially a shallow rehash of the same research into state failure in Afghanistan Rubin did in 1995. He's not saying anything really new.