<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: www.Google.iq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2011/04/01/www-google-iq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2011/04/01/www-google-iq/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=www-google-iq</link>
	<description>The FPA Global Affairs Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:18:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reid Smith</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2011/04/01/www-google-iq/#comment-6630</link>
		<dc:creator>Reid Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 18:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iraq.foreignpolicyblogs.com/?p=559#comment-6630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ellie, thanks for your comments. Any copy-editing that needs my attention in this article? As far as I can tell, it looks clean...also, I have provided several in-line links, but perhaps could do a better job high-lighting them! Thanks for reading!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ellie, thanks for your comments. Any copy-editing that needs my attention in this article? As far as I can tell, it looks clean&#8230;also, I have provided several in-line links, but perhaps could do a better job high-lighting them! Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie K</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2011/04/01/www-google-iq/#comment-6628</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iraq.foreignpolicyblogs.com/?p=559#comment-6628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t want to appear mean-spirited, and assume these comments are reviewed before appearing. Regardless, let me first thank you for making this site compatible with requirements for readability. It is one of the few that I am able to use easily, despite having all sorts of low-vision enhancements and magnifications enabled. I thank you for that.

I found this post informative. It was a worthwhile use of my time, and provided value, which is not all that common on the internet, what with content farms, spam blogs etc. However, and now the less pleasant part, there are some typos and grammar errors that were puzzling enough that I had to re-read the sentence or paragraph several times through to grasp the meaning. These look like the oversights of someone who created original content (not a copy-and-paste job!). They aren&#039;t the sort of things that MS Word or grammar checkers often catch. Mea culpa of plenty of the same, as evident on my blogs!

I hope you accept this in the spirit in which it was made, which is a desire to be helpful, as it would be far easier to say nothing.

One final thought: A few in-line links or source references at the end would be appreciated. Perhaps that is counter to your editor&#039;s policy though.

*Interesting that you use both a CAPTCHA and a reCAPTCHA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t want to appear mean-spirited, and assume these comments are reviewed before appearing. Regardless, let me first thank you for making this site compatible with requirements for readability. It is one of the few that I am able to use easily, despite having all sorts of low-vision enhancements and magnifications enabled. I thank you for that.</p>
<p>I found this post informative. It was a worthwhile use of my time, and provided value, which is not all that common on the internet, what with content farms, spam blogs etc. However, and now the less pleasant part, there are some typos and grammar errors that were puzzling enough that I had to re-read the sentence or paragraph several times through to grasp the meaning. These look like the oversights of someone who created original content (not a copy-and-paste job!). They aren&#8217;t the sort of things that MS Word or grammar checkers often catch. Mea culpa of plenty of the same, as evident on my blogs!</p>
<p>I hope you accept this in the spirit in which it was made, which is a desire to be helpful, as it would be far easier to say nothing.</p>
<p>One final thought: A few in-line links or source references at the end would be appreciated. Perhaps that is counter to your editor&#8217;s policy though.</p>
<p>*Interesting that you use both a CAPTCHA and a reCAPTCHA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.Google.iq &#124; Homepage</title>
		<link>http://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2011/04/01/www-google-iq/#comment-6627</link>
		<dc:creator>www.Google.iq &#124; Homepage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 09:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iraq.foreignpolicyblogs.com/?p=559#comment-6627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] www.Google.iq Continuing on its quest to cover all of the world&#8217;s top 40 languages and 99 percent of its Internet users, Google has finally launched Iraq. Read more on Foreign Policy Blogs [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.Google.iq" rel="nofollow">http://www.Google.iq</a> Continuing on its quest to cover all of the world&#8217;s top 40 languages and 99 percent of its Internet users, Google has finally launched Iraq. Read more on Foreign Policy Blogs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
