Foreign Policy Blogs

The Iranian Women in American Journalism Project (IWAJ): Kelly Golnoush Niknejad

How at the time a recent graduate of Columbia Journalism School, from her parents’ living room in Boston, launched one of the most trusted and sophisticated sources of news and commentary on Iran?

Born in Iran, Kelly Golnoush Niknejad moved to the United States when she was 17. She holds a B.A. in political science and writing and a law degree with an international and European focus. Following her initial news work in Southern California and Massachusetts, Golnoush moved to New York City and earned two master’s degrees in journalism from Columbia University, focusing first on print and then politics and government.

Golnoush’s work includes reporting for PBS/FRONTLINE, Los Angeles Times, San Diego Union-Tribune, Time, Foreign Policy, and California Lawyer. Golnoush speaks regularly on digital journalism and Iranian politics. Past venues have included MIT, Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, Columbia University, Paley Center/Carnegie, and the Poynter Institute. Tehran Bureau‘s coverage of “Modern Iran” recently made Columbia Journalism School’s honor list of “50 Great Stories” produced by alumni the last 100 years. She is also the inaugural recipient of the Innovator Award from Columbia Journalism School for ”inspiring, creating, developing, or implementing new ideas that further the cause of journalism.” The Daily Beast named her one of “17 people who are changing the world” through their editing, blogging, reporting, videos, and Twitter feeds.

Kelly G. Niknejad

 How long has Tehran Bureau been in business?

I launched it on Nov. 5, 2008.

Were you born in Iran? How long did you live there?

Yes, I was born and raised in Iran. My family moved here soon after my 17th birthday.

Tell us about your education.
 My schooling was in English until after the revolution. I then went to junior high and high school in west Tehran. I started college in San Diego. I majored in political science, then went straight on to law school. I passed the bar in California, where I am licensed to practice. I later earned two masters degrees from Columbia Journalism School, one in print and the other specializing in political reporting.

How did you end up in the journalism profession?

Journalism was a happy accident. I needed income to get through a book I was writing and landed my first news job covering San Diego courts for City News Service of Los Angeles. I loved reporting so much it took over my life. The clue was there at my first interview, which was at the downtown San Diego courthouse. I’d been there hundreds of times as a law student, and later as an attorney, but I got really excited when I was going there for my initial interview as a journalist. I caught a glimpse of the ”Press Room” sign from the escalator and it was as if I was in that space for the first time.

Who would you name among some of your main sources of inspiration in your journalistic achievements?
Since I went into journalism, I’ve been surrounded by very inspiring people, starting with Kelly Wheeler at City News Service, my first boss. Bill Rempel, a longtime investigative reporter at the Los Angeles Times; Nicholas Lemann and Alexander Stille of Columbia Journalism School; and David Fanning, the executive producer of Frontline, are geniuses. I recently met David E. Hoffman who was the brilliant foreign editor of The Washington Post. He reminds me of why I love being a journalist so much.

In the difficult business of journalism, you seem to have pulled off something close to impossible; and that is launching a new news outlet entirely on your own. How did you achieve this?

I got as much experience and education as I could; then I followed my instincts. My own reporting on Iran in journalism school turned up a much more telling picture than the simple narrative that existed in the mainstream media. With so much information available online, I believe readers are going to increasingly want the real story and that’s going to come from specialized and well curated news sources. Almost everyone who covers Iran is worried about access to the country. Trying to report in a way that maintains your access to the country affects the kind of reporting you do. Tehran Bureau was a success from the start because we’re not about that. We try to take the politics out of the journalism and let the truth speak for itself.

You also have a massive following on Facebook via the IRAN Tehran Burea page, which has close to 230,000 followers. This is quite significant. How did the Facebook page come about?

It’s quite remarkable. Every time I go to our Facebook page it seems another thousand or so have joined. The success of that page is due to Amir Ebrahimnia of Derooted Creative Agency, who set it up and fine tuned as a platform for young Iranians to discuss issues related to Iran around Tehran Bureau.

Tell us about your funding and your relationship with PBS? How much editorial independence do you exert on content at Tehran Bureau?

I first got to work with Frontline thanks to Greg Barker and Claudia Rizzi, producer and co-producer of “Showdown with Iran.” That is how I met David Fanning and how he came to know my work. Fast forward to the summer of 2009 when we were covering events in Iran. We still had no funding. When they heard that I was running Tehran Bureau from my parents’ living room, they gave me a new home. We’ve been supported in part through grants from the William H. Donner Foundation, the Flora Family Foundation, and Plymouth Rock founder and chairman Jim Stone. Frontline has supported us for three years. I look forward to whatever is next.
From an editorial perspective, we’ve been completely independent from the beginning and remain so.

How supportive do you think the Iranian-American community has been toward your efforts? Has it been mainly moral, financial or a combination of both?

Unfortunately, very few in our community understand professional journalism so the support so far has been extremely limited.

In the course of your career as a woman working with a major international news organization (PBS), what have been some of the key challenges that you have encountered?

Iranians covering Iran is still a relatively new phenomenon in U.S. media. I’m not sure how much of the resistance I get is on account of being an Iranian or from being a woman, because women are all over media. When I’m working, I feel incredibly strong. Journalism is such a powerful feeling in me that I don’t think about it in terms of being a woman until someone reminds me.

How do you think being an Iranian woman or a woman of Iranian descent has played itself out in your career?
It has made me a hundred times stronger. Once you’ve built that strength, you can do a lot with it.
In retrospect, you’re grateful for it.

How do you think the Arab Spring will impact women’s status in the Arab/Islamic world? Are you an optimist?

If we could use the same innovative model of reporting that we use at Tehran Bureau to cover the Arab revolts, I’d have a much better feeling about it. Journalism focused on the issue, month after month, year after year, will make it harder to hijack those revolutions.

Ten years from now, what kind of an Iran do you envision in your mind?

One where journalists can report freely using their real bylines.

 
  • Giani

    Imagine reporting from Tehran about American politics and affairs and how Americans think and feel

    For being able to report about Iranian affairs, one must live in Iran

    Analysis of Iran experts in America and west pretty much worthless .. mostly used for anti Iran propaganda propose

    .

    • Golnoush Niknejad

      Giani,

      Thank you for taking the time to read the Q&A. You don’t appear to be very familiar with Tehran Bureau. We have more people reporting on the ground from Iran than any other news organization based out of Iran.

      K. G. Niknejad

  • Mohammad Alireza

    Niknejad:

    “From an editorial perspective, we’ve been completely independent from the beginning and remain so.”

    I am not sure what you mean by “completely independent” given the fact that a couple of my submissions were rejected because they were too “anti-American” and therefore would put your funding at risk.

    And if anybody reads your site carefully never will they find any articles or op-eds that question American foreign policy.

    Hopefully one day you will have a site that is completely independent and your funding does not come with strings attached and you can enjoy the freedom that supposedly exists in American journalism.

    • Golnoush Niknejad

      Mohammad Reza,

      Why do you put quotes around “anti-American”? Even if I had, per your allegation, rejected two of your articles on that basis, would I send that to you in an email?

      I don’t know what site you’re looking at. You don’t even have to read Tehran Bureau “carefully,” as you put it, to find passionate debates in favor and against U.S. foreign policy.

      • Mohammad Alireza

        Below is the article that was rejected, and no, you did not send me an email saying it was rejected because the article was sent to you via a go-between and the reply was that it was too “anti-American”:

        “With advocates of military action against Iran beating war drums so loudly that they are drowning out sanity the rest of us are facing a situation where going over the cliff like lemmings is supposedly only a few months away.

        So deafening has this become that one vital fact is missing: a military strike on Iran’s civilian nuclear installations will be a nuclear attack in terms of the radioactive contamination that will be released by these so called “bunker busters”.

        Cleaning up this toxic crime against humanity will be impossible and will result in deformities and genetic damage for generations of Iranians, as well as those in nearby countries, with estimates of those that will be irreversibly poisoned in the millions.

        Some who advocate military attack, a preventable crime against humanity and the biosphere, claim that it is justified because the current regime in Iran is similar to Hitler’s and is determined to instigate a second Holocaust. A couple of extremists may talk such nonsense but most certainly Iran or Iranians would never be a party to such a crime that was invented by Europeans.

        Others justify it because removing the regime is in America’s “vital national interest” – meaning military, commercial, and political domination of the Middle East, but this is never openly declared but is camouflaged under the pure and righteous mission of bringing about “human rights” or “democracy”. Not mentioned is the 20 plus TRILLION dollars worth of hydrocarbons under Iran’s territory.

        As an Iranian who has lived for decades in America and Europe, and now lives in Iran, and has many Jewish American friends, I find it astonishing that these advocates for what would amount to a war crime are being given megaphones to broadcast their criminal intentions through main street media outlets while only a tiny minority is objecting.

        What is also shocking to witness is advanced democracies behaving like marauding Neanderthals while fooling themselves into thinking that because they are using high-tech killing machines this gives them a veneer of civility and superiority. Civilized savagery is still savagery no matter how similar to a sequel to “Terminator” it happens to be.

        Regime change is an internal issue for Iranians living in Iran, and not anybody else’s business. History is on our side as never have oppressive dictators been able to stay in power.

        The social evolution of Iran is up to Iranians that are living here and we do not need any assistance in the forms of bombs or sanctions. In fact if the sanctions were lifted ordinary Iranians would be in a far stronger position as private businesses would flourish and be able to export and become a counterbalance to state run corporations.

        Sanctions have only strengthened the regime and all this war talk has increased their restrictions on the limited freedoms we have here.

        Iranians will bring about democracy and the rule of law to Iran and will do so on their own and in their own way.

        Any interference by warmongering Iranian exiles or Israeli’s seeking to keep their monopoly on power projection in the region by taking preventive military action will only set back freedom for Iranians in Iran, and most likely trigger a region wide war that will last for decades, boost oil prices, and cause generational crimes against unborn innocents. “

  • Mohsen

    I have been regularly reading the “Tehran Bureau”, particularly Mr. Sahimi’s pieces. I was not aware that the editor of the Bureau is an Iranian American. An excellent job — particularly for someone who it appears to be doing it alone and without a strong organizational support team. Regarding the question whether or not the Iranian community have been supporting of her work, and her diplomatically given answer, I hate to write this, but my own personal experience as an Iranian American Businessman, unfortunately suggests that we are not a very supporting community in diaspora (of course individual exceptions always exists). As there is room for improvement on everything that exists, I would say, so can this news site. Perhaps a section on the site can be allocated to “suggestions and inputs”. Keep of the good work Ms. Golnoush.

    • Golnoush Niknejad

      Thank you, Mohsen. You can send any suggestions and feedback to me by email: info [at] tehranbureau [dot] com.

    • koko

      ranian authorities have banned the daughter of opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi from working in the field of university teaching. The network «ABC News» U.S. News that the Iranian authorities prevented the daughter from Moussaoui’s work at the University of Zahra and has filed its name from the list of lecturers, where she was to teach art at the university where the study is limited to girls.

Author

Reza Akhlaghi
Reza Akhlaghi

Born in Tehran Iran and based in Toronto, Canada, Reza Akhlaghi is a senior blogger at the FPA Blogs and editor of its Middle East page. Reza also produces FPA's 'Candid Discussion Series'; interviews with influential policy makers, writers, and media personalities in the field of foreign policy.

Reza holds a Double Major BA Honors in English Literature and Communication Studies from York University in Toronto; an MA degree in Communication Studies from University of Calgary in Alberta; and an MBA from Schulich School of Business at York University.

Reza is fluent in Persian, Turkish, and English, and has working knowledge of Korean.
Follow Reza on Twitter: @RezaAkhlaghi

China_blog_ad