As the result of a lawsuit filed in 1999 on behalf of Palestinian prisoners, Shin Bet must operate according to detailed methods. These rules allow the use of "moderate physical and psychological pressure" in order to extract information from detainees, including sensory deprivation. The 1999 ruling by the Israeli Supreme Court did, however, ban certain interrogation methods, such as the "shabah position." The Court did acknowledge that interrogations were likely to be unpleasant considering their intent was to break the will of the suspect. According to Shin Bet officials, interrogation methods are compliant with the 1999 ruling and that the B'Tselem report is erroneous.
According to the United Nation Convention Against Torture, torture may be defined as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession." Israel is a signatory to this Convention, though nearly half of Israel Knesset members support harsh interrogation methods.
A report in 2004 suggests that Shin Bet methods were exemplified in the Abu Ghraib scandal, where US military personnel documented several cases of torture committed against Iraqi prisoners.
In related news, a New York federal judge threw out a war crimes charges against a former Shin Bet director for ordering the aerial bombing of civilian targets in an effort to assasinate HAMAS leader, Saleh Shahada.
Opinio Juris is highlighting the case.
San Fransisco Chronicle/Reuters/Guardian UK/Boston Globe
Photo: BBC