But is Hezbollah's recent 'success’ in this game really cause for alarm in Iraq, or is this just another case of the regional winds shaping the media discourse? Either way, if one was to look at the Lebanon case study, one would see that Hezbollah's 'state within a state’ is more than just a product of its military prowess.
With the Mahdi Militia-Hezbollah comparison, the issue of weapons outside the control of 'state’ immediately comes to mind. In Hezbollah's case, their lopsided military advantage over the Lebanese state and other parties can be seen as a legacy of Syrian occupation and Iranian sponsorship. Today, in Iraq many have strongly argued that Iran is doing the same with the Mahdi Militia through the provision of weapons and training.
Politically, however, Hezbollah has become the flagship of a larger opposition coalition in Lebanon. Although the group's resistance against Israel gave it nationalist credentials, one should also look at the softer side of the party in order to understand why Hezbollah has also acquired political legitimacy beyond its traditional Shia constituency. For example, it is worth noting that the group has acquired credibility by providing social services to many Lebanese beyond the reach of the government.
These socio-political factors have in effect given the 'state within a state’ de facto legitimacy in the eyes of many Lebanese. So while the Sadrist Movement and its Mahdi Militia might be looked upon as a nascent Hezbollah, setting up a 'state within a state’ doesn't happen overnight. In fact, to come to fruition it might take years of government ineptitude, continued work at the grassroots level, coalition building, and significant outside support. Thus, the prevention of this dynamic from taking shape may very well be possible… if the Iraqi government proves itself capable in addressing the socio-political aspects of the 'state within a state’ as well as the military ones.