
Clinton’s visit to the OAS from June 6th to June 8th has some pointed goals for the current US Administration. Issues concerning blocking Cuba’s admission into the OAS, the after effects of the ousting of Zelaya in Honduras, and the challenge of other inter-regional bodies created by many leftists leaders and supported by most nations in Latin America, without Canada and the US. One organisation of concern is that of the Union of South American States (UNASUR) in Ecuador. UNASUR is a NATO type organisation that is thought by some as gaining added legitimacy over the OAS. Clinton’s visit to the UNASUR chair in Ecuador hopes to reinforce American support in the OAS and cement US interests in the region, especially since the US has not been accepted as part of UNASUR. UNASUR was key in responding to UK oil interests and drilling off the coast of the Falkland/Maldives Islands, where Argentina claims rights over the islands and the waters surrounding the British colony. Another organisation formed outside the prevue of the US is the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), started by Chavez and Castro in 2004, it seeks to promote the interests of leftist leaders in Latin America. US concerns in this week’s meetings will most likely rally around limiting drug violence in Latin America and promote trade interests among US allies in Latin America. Dealing with natural disasters will also be a topic of concern for all, as Chile and Haiti continue to deal with the destruction of their respective earthquakes and the Americas continues to send aid and assistance despite it no longer being followed in the media. The impression however still shows a lack of interest in Latin America, and that Clinton will do just enough to keep the US in the game, but will do as much as to not play any serious role or define any clear policy in the region.
Clinton’s four days in Latin America will do nothing but give a slight taste of what it is like for those in the region to be on the radar of the Obama administration. Attention from the US towards Colombia will be a constant due to the debate on trade vs. human rights issues between the two countries and the resistance by many in the US for a Colombia FTA, despite the successes Colombia has had fighting internal terror and economic growth. The new post-Uribe era and Colombia’s elections and the issue of US bases in Colombia will also be a prime concern of Clinton, especially since those issues are a favorite topic for Chavez and his supporters in Latin America. A lot of attention may come to Latin America from Brazil’s and Turkey’s deal with Iran on its nuclear fuel, as well as Chavez’s ties with Iran and those in the Middle East who seek to link the two region’s in political debate. Nuclear and security relations between Venezuela and Iran, and Brazil’s policy involvement and economic agreements in the Middle East may bring the Clinton’s premier policy concerns into Latin America, but whether it is a benefit to Latin America to become enrolled in the Middle East is a question that only time can clarify. Attention at any cost usually roots future responses in chaos, but leaders and policies always change in Latin America, unfortunately this is not the case as much in the Middle East. The US needs to take Latin America into its greater policy developments, giving credit as its neighbour and respect the benefits and support of having such a diverse growing region in their own backyard. A lack of attention by the US hurts the US and its interests in the long run in the Americas.