Foreign Policy Blogs

Cuba’s omnipresence in Cartagena

This weekend’s Summit of the Americas may not include representation from Cuba, but Cuba is by no means absent from the Summit. In fact, general policy toward the island appeared to be the most significant issue dividing the Hemisphere in advance of this weekend’s meetings: Latin American nations saw Cuba’s continued exclusion from the Summit as counterproductive, while the United States insisted that as long as Cuba continued to fail to meet the democratic requirements of the Organization of American States, its leaders could not be involved in any of the Organization’s events (including the Summit of the Americas). With diplomatic aplomb, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos solved the issue by proposing to make Cuba’s future participation a topic for discussion at the Summit.

So Raúl Castro will not be in Cartagena, but the nations of the Hemisphere will discuss whether he could be invited in the future. And the leaders of the countries of ALBA that were threatening not to show up to the Summit actually agreed to attend following this resolution (all except Rafael Correa of Ecuador). The way is paved for the United States to maintain its opposition respectfully, while stepping aside to allow future policy to be determined by the apparent consensus of most all other countries in the Hemisphere.

Is that what will happen? Not yet, certainly. The meeting of foreign ministers that considered a proposal to invite Cuba to future Summits ended after the United States and Canada delivered their veto.

But the conversation did not end there, and it appears to be coming to a head, as ALBA countries have drawn the line on excluding Cuba. Bolivia’s Foreign Minister, David Choquehuanca, has stated: “This is the last Summit of the Americas unless Cuba is allowed to take part.” The foreign ministers of Venezuela, Argentina and Uruguay have all declined to sign the Summit’s final declaration unless the United States and Canada remove their veto of future Cuban participation. And the most moderate, conservative Latin American nations are taking a stand, as well. President Santos of Colombia and President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil have both agreed that there should be no more Americas Summits without Cuba included. President Santos opened the Summit today with a critique of Cuba’s absence, saying that the exclusion was an anachronism of the Cold War. He is a well-respected leader, and a strong ally, of course, of the United States.

Will the United States and Canada test the resolve of all of these leaders and maintain their veto? Or will they take advantage of this opportunity to step aside and accede to the majority consensus in a Hemisphere demanding exactly this kind of signal from its northern partners?

As President Obama noted, media tends to sweep over the progress made at these kinds of summits in favor of focusing on the “flashier” controversies. He’s right: there are a wide range of issues upon which the nations of the Hemisphere are finding means to cooperate during these meetings, under the theme of “Connecting the Americas: Partners for Prosperity” — from expanding access to information and communication technology for development to bolstering middle class populations. It would certainly be a shame to overshadow all of that by remaining stubborn on the Cuba issue.

(Photo credit: Carolyn Kaster, Associated Press)

 
  • Roy Nelson, Ph.D.

    As a Floridian, I want to say that the time is long past for the U.S. to drop its unuseful policy towards Cuba which appears to have been designed largely to appease certain conservative political forces in southern Florida. More can be achieved by striving to build a good working relationship with Cuba instead of forcing it out of organizations such as the Organization of American States. Younger people of Cuban descent living in the U.S. do not have that attitude.

    • Melissa Lockhart Fortner

      Thanks for reading, Roy! More and more people are coming around to that point of view, certainly. There’s still push-back in Congress, and oftentimes those in favor of maintaining current U.S. policy toward Cuba are louder than those against. Still, when an entire Hemisphere of allies opposes our policies, one would think they might have some effect on the Obama administration’s thinking. But that has not been the case — for years. And in an election year, Cuban-Americans in Florida are never a group that politicians want to upset. Status quo is easier than change that can cause a tumult.

  • http://rapadoo.com Chris Celius

    I must say that there has been some movement toward integrating Cuba into the Amecican diplomatic community since Castro stepped down. However, this past weekend’s Summit seemed like a battle between North and South over Cuba. The stand off could mean that CELAC would not succeed, given most of the battle revolved around the OAS.
    Great coverage.

  • John

    While a de facto Cuban president might be invited as an observer to the Seventh Summit, a Cuban participant should be only be welcomed to Summits when Cuba agrees to the Inter-American Democratic Charter. Of course, Article 1 of the Charter may be the issue for the current regime in power in Cuba, might it not?

    Article 1
    The peoples of the Americas have a right to democracy and their governments have an obligation to promote and defend it. Democracy is essential for the social, political, and economic development of the peoples of the Americas.
    http://www.oas.org/charter/docs/resolution1_en_p4.htm

Author

Melissa Lockhart Fortner
Melissa Lockhart Fortner

Melissa Lockhart Fortner is Senior External Affairs Officer at the Pacific Council on International Policy in Los Angeles, having served previously as Senior Programs Officer for the Council. From 2007-2009, she held a research position at the University of Southern California (USC) School of International Relations, where she closely followed economic and political developments in Mexico and in Cuba, and analyzed broader Latin American trends. Her research considered the rise and relative successes of Latin American multinationals (multilatinas); economic, social and political changes in Central America since the civil wars in the region; and Wal-Mart’s role in Latin America, among other topics. Melissa is a graduate of Pomona College, and currently resides in Pasadena, California, with her husband, Jeff Fortner.

Follow her on Twitter @LockhartFortner.

GreadDecisions in foreign policy discussion group ad v2