Tax Package , An excellent bit of legislation came to a screeching halt on the Senate floor early this afternoon. The Senate Finance Committee's tax package for energy (see my item on this in the previous post), and passed by them 14-6 just two days ago, was held from a final vote on the Senate Floor when a sufficient number of Senators, 36 of them (and all but two Republicans), voted against ending debate. Ouch. The A.P. (via the "Boston Globe") reported in Big oil companies spared tax hikes what seem to me to be two important points:
"Oil companies earned $111 billion in profits last year and at that rate stand to earn $1 trillion over the 10 years covered by the tax package, said Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., rejecting suggestions that "this is an undue burden' on oil companies."
"Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., whose Finance Committee crafted the tax package, said the incentives for renewable and alternative fuels "will help wean ourselves away from OPEC … from these very high gas prices.'"
Nevertheless, 36 Senators have blocked this initiative.
Okay, so here's a news item that caught my eye tonight: Climate change could hit homes, beaches, business. "Economists at three North Carolina universities and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany said the study showed that as climate change causes submersion of coastal areas and increased erosion, North Carolina will endure billions of dollars in property damage, lost tourism and disruption to coastal businesses."
So, how did North Carolina's two Senators vote on the Finance Committee's tax package? You guessed it: Against. That's what I mean by the disconnect between good public policy and business as usual.
CAFE Vote , Having worked out a deal behind closed doors, Senators announced a deal on MPG standards. Senate Votes to Raise Car Fuel Standards says the headline from the A.P. courtesy of ABC News. Here's the whole story from Senator Dianne Feinstein's website. This new standard, upping the MPG requirement by 10 by 2020, will:
This is good public policy, folks. Bill Nelson, whose impassioned speech on the CAFE issue I noted in yesterday's post, was one of the drivers, as it were, behind this hugely important legislation.
Stay tuned, though. There's still the Renewable Portfolio Standard, there will be backfires set against the CAFE standards, hopefully there'll be more to say about the tax package, and there's all the legislation forthcoming from the House.
In a hopeful sign there, the Ways and Means Committee today approved their "Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Act of 2007" and sent it to the floor for consideration. The vote was 24-16. Although not as aggressive as the Senate tax package, it leaves considerable room for hope that a much more aggressive approach will emerge from the final legislation when the conference committee puts out its final version.
