Foreign Policy Blogs

The Limits of Leapfrogging

This week's Economist contains two articles that discuss leapfrogging technology – when a society skips a generation in technology. The usual example is the cell phone, which a developing country can adopt without ever having had widespread landlines. Both Economist articles refer to a World Bank report on Global Economic Prospects. Leapfrogging is usually seen as a hopeful indication that developing economies can quickly establish modern technology-based industries that are both profitable and more environmentaly friendly. The Economist throws a some cold water on that optimism.

Their conclusion is that there are relatively few technologies that can be widely adopted without the expensive and resource-intensive infrastructure investments like electricity and roads. They also point out that all of the more social development sectors (education, governance, economic policy) are also required for new technologies to come into common use. So, although data supports the argument that technology absorption in developing countries will happen on its own, technology diffusion will require a little more effort.

 

Author

Kevin Dean

Kevin Dean is a graduate student pursuing a master's degree in international conflict management and humanitarian emergencies at Georgetown University. Before returning to school in Fall 2006, he spent six years working in the former Soviet Union - most of that time spent in Central Asia. He has managed a diverse range of international development programs for the US State Department and USAID. He has also consulted for several UN agencies and international NGOs, and is fluent in Russian. Kevin is originally from Des Moines, Iowa and studied Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies at the University of Iowa.