Foreign Policy Blogs

Does Gates's Money Buy Too Much Influence?

The fiesty WHO malaria chief, Dr. Arata Kochi, thinks that the Gates Foundation's $1.2 billion supporting for malaria research gives them too much influence over the field. He believes that it is now becoming difficult to find non-biased scientists to peer review research, and that the Foundation using its weight to to ensure that research from its scientists is put into policy instead of letting the best research win.

Dr. Kochi is apparently known for being undiplomatic, and this could easily just be a turf war – he might simply be worried that the WHO will lose some of its clout as the health policy arbiter for the world. But that doesn't mean he's necessarily wrong, either. It's definitely something to watch.

 

Author

Kevin Dean

Kevin Dean is a graduate student pursuing a master's degree in international conflict management and humanitarian emergencies at Georgetown University. Before returning to school in Fall 2006, he spent six years working in the former Soviet Union - most of that time spent in Central Asia. He has managed a diverse range of international development programs for the US State Department and USAID. He has also consulted for several UN agencies and international NGOs, and is fluent in Russian. Kevin is originally from Des Moines, Iowa and studied Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies at the University of Iowa.