Foreign Policy Blogs

A Janus-Faced Judiciary?

Well, how to interpret this?:

On the one hand, from Harare Zimbabwe's High Court ordered the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (ZEC) not to recount the results from nearly two-dozen constituencies because the result of the presidential poll had not yet been announced. This represents a blow to Robert Mugabe.

On the other hand, the same court today rejected the Movement for Democratic Change's (MDC) demands for the immediate release of the election results. This represents a blow to Morgan Tsvangirai.

Is the courtspeaking out of both sides of its mouth? Trying to have it both ways? Are the judges attempting to split the difference between the two sides, showing favoritism toward neither? Were these results simply what the evidence required? Is the court muddling through? It is nearly impossible to know. but this split decision means that we are no closer to knowing the results of the elections and the future courses of action today than we were yesterday.

A Janus-Faced Judiciary?

Zapiro — Mail & Guardian, 10 April 2008.

 

Author

Derek Catsam

Derek Catsam is a Professor of history and Kathlyn Cosper Dunagan Professor in the Humanities at the University of Texas of the Permian Basin. He is also Senior Research Associate at Rhodes University. Derek writes about race and politics in the United States and Africa, sports, and terrorism. He is currently working on books on bus boycotts in the United States and South Africa in the 1940s and 1950s and on the 1981 South African Springbok rugby team's tour to the US. He is the author of three books, dozens of scholarly articles and reviews, and has published widely on current affairs in African, American, and European publications. He has lived, worked, and travelled extensively throughout southern Africa. He writes about politics, sports, travel, pop culture, and just about anything else that comes to mind.

Areas of Focus:
Africa; Zimbabwe; South Africa; Apartheid

Contact