Foreign Policy Blogs

Supreme Court rules GITMO detainees can challenge detention

In yet another resounding slap in the face to the Bush administration on its policies during the so-called war on terror, the U.S. Supreme Court Thursday ruled 5-4 that foreign nationals held at Guantanamo Bay have a right to challenge their detention in civilian courts.

“We hold these petitioners do have the habeas corpus privilege,” Justice Anthony Kennedy said, writing for the majority.

The Court, issuing its opinion on Boumediene/Al-Odah v. Bush, cautioned it was not ruling the detainees were unjustly detained. That, Kennedy said, was a matter left to District Court judges.  Instead, the court ruled that Congress has violated the constitution when it took away habeas rights.  If Congress wishes to suspend the writ of habeas corpus, the Court said, it may only do say when the United States is facing a rebellion or an invasion.  Presumably, the international threat posed by transnational terrorist groups, such as al-Qaida, do not fall within that Constitutionally defined doctrine.

The Supreme Court in earlier cases deemed the prior Bush-indoctrinated war crimes tribunal illegal because only Congress has to the right to establish laws of merit. In response, Congress enacted a new set of tribunal procedures and amended the Uniform Code of Military Justice to include, among others, conspiracy to commit terrorist acts against the United States as a violation of the laws of war.

The ruling follows the beginnings of the tribunal proceedings for self-proclaimed Sept. 11-mastermind, Khalid Sheik Muhammad and other co-conspirators.

 

Author

Daniel Graeber

Daniel Graeber is a writer for United Press International covering Iraq, Afghanistan and the broader Levant. He has published works on international and constitutional law pertaining to US terrorism cases and on child soldiers. His first major work, entitled The United States and Israel: The Implications of Alignment, is featured in the text, Strategic Interests in the Middle East: Opposition or Support for US Foreign Policy. He holds a MA in Diplomacy and International Conflict Management from Norwich University, where his focus was international relations theory, international law, and the role of non-state actors.

Areas of Focus:International law; Middle East; Government and Politics; non-state actors

Contact