Foreign Policy Blogs

Editorial: Britain, Al Qaeda and Pakistan

The United Kingdom has unveiled a 174-page report on how to tackle the Al Qaeda threat facing it. The threat is no longer confined to Underground blasts but may be “a chemical or even nuclear terrorist attack”. And those who do it will possibly be linked to two unstable and extremism-haunted “Islamic” states, Pakistan and Somalia, “as well as Yemen and countries in sub-Saharan Africa”. Al Qaeda doesn’t only train in the tribal regions of Pakistan, it inspires “self-starting” followers long-distance too.

An interior ministry official in London pointed to Pakistan in particular: “Pakistan weaves its way through virtually everything in this strategy [report]. We attach importance to the huge amount of work we’re doing in Pakistan. We’ve got very big collaborative programmes with the Pakistani authorities, the new government… we’re very interested in working with them”. In short, “militants in Pakistan pose the greatest concern”.

Britain has also been voicing concern about the bad state of preparedness of the Pakistani security establishment. One British national Rashid Rauf, involved in the Heathrow terrorism plot and linked to Al Qaeda, was arrested in Pakistan but “let off” by the Pakistani police while he was been taken to the court. Another British national, Umar Sheikh, was actually involved in the 9/11 attack and was responsible for the killing of the American journalist Daniel Pearl. Thousands of dual-nationality Pakistanis who travel from the UK to Pakistan during vacations are vulnerable to the terrorist trap of Al Qaeda in Pakistan.

Pakistan’s past policies are responsible for the rise of extremism in the country, some of them conceived in close collaboration with the US and the UK during the Afghan war against the Soviets. One must also look closely at what the UK did to itself. Terrorism may be an inspiration coming from Al Qaeda in Pakistan but Muslim radicalism in the UK is home-grown. Even elected Muslims in the UK tend to be more aggressive in their identity than the usually careful Pakistanis.

The mosques in the UK were not radicalised by Pakistan; that was done by British policy, based on ignoring the usurpation of Barelvi mosques by Saudi-funded radical organisations. London refused to read the message when Pakistan’s biggest Barelvi leader, Maulana Shah Ahmad Noorani, began to have trouble talking to his flock in the UK. British Pakistanis, 700,000 strong, were all Barelvis to begin with. Now London is to have the world’s largest Deobandi mosque.

The UK literally borrowed the hardline Islamists from France and the rest of Europe thinking it was acquiring “assets” for its Middle East policy. It doomed its majority Muslim population composed of Pakistanis in the process as most of these Arab extremists linked up with Al Qaeda and its funded madrassas in Pakistan and sent the expat Pakistanis in a beeline to their handlers in Karachi, Lahore and Peshawar. The UK remained passive to accusations of having converted London to Londonistan till July 7, 2005 when a group of Pakistani Brits attacked as suicide-bombers. But till then, Lashkar-e-Tayba had received millions of pounds as “charity” from the UK.

Pakistan is in trouble today. Al Qaeda is embedded here and Pakistanis are more busy hating America and its side-kick, the UK, than paying attention to the consequences of allowing the terrorists to win territory and then enforce their own laws on it. Pakistan may have the will to fight them but lacks the material capacity to do so. The British report is right in its diagnosis that Pakistan has to be helped. Whether this will happen in these cash-strapped days is another matter.

What is significant is that Pakistan is doing much better than in the past in keeping tabs on the UK Pakistanis after they enter Pakistan. It has tipped off the British government about “more than 20 Britons believed to have spent time with radical militant groups and then returned to the UK”. Pakistanis elected to the British parliament need to play a bigger role when they come to Pakistan, talking less about how wrong Britain was about Iraq and more about how Pakistan can help by preventing the expats from the UK to link up with Al Qaeda. *

 

Daily Times (Pakistan)

 

Author

Bilal Qureshi

Bilal Qureshi is a resident of Washington, DC, so it is only natural that he is tremendously interested in politics. He is also fascinated by the relationship between Pakistan, the country of his birth, and the United States of America, his adopted homeland. Therefore, he makes every effort to read major newspapers in Pakistan and what is being said about Washington, while staying fully alert to the analysis and the news being reported in the American press about Pakistan. After finishing graduate school, he started using his free time to write to various papers in Pakistan in an effort to clarify whatever misconceptions he noticed in the press, especially about the United States. This pastime became a passion after his letters were published in Vanity Fair and The New Yorker and his writing became more frequent and longer. Now, he is here, writing a blog about Pakistan managed by Foreign Policy Association.

Areas of Focus:
Taliban; US-Pakistan Relations; Culture and Society

Contact