Foreign Policy Blogs

Zimbabwe: To Support or Not to Support, That is the Question

Respected Africanist Robert Rotberg has an op-ed piece in The Boston Globe in which he reveals the tightrope that Morgan Tsvangirai has to walk in dealing with Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe. Mugabe still controls far too much of the government, is wildly unpredictable, and has shown no inclination either to give up power or to live up to his agreements.

We know this. It is not news. Which perhaps explains the deeply unsatisfying, or at least seemingly partial, nature of Rotberg’s conclusions:

Washington needs to back Tsvangirai vigorously. Clinton should pressure the new South African government and the South African Development Community to remove Mugabe. She could use the moral power of her office to impress upon African national leaders that Mugabe must go and the unity government be led exclusively by Tsvangirai. But it is too soon to supply substantial aid to a nation-state still manipulated by Mugabe’s despotism.

I have yet to see a satisfactory explanation for how South Africa or SADC are supposed “to remove Mugabe.” That they ought to do so is of little utility without some idea of how, exactly, this rather herculean task would be accomplished. It is undoubtably true that South Africa and SADC have not done enough to pressure Mugabe. But it is far from certain what leverage, short of the threat of war, the SADC nations, even relatively mighty South Africa, have over someone who quite clearly has shown himself not only impervious to outside criticism, but who uses such criticism to his advantage among his still numerous (and armed) supporters.

I can understand the desire not to reward Mugabe with financial support. But surely there are ways to use targeted financial resources and other forms of aid both for political and humanitarian purposes, with Tsvangirai, who has asked the United States and the rest of the world for its help. If the outside world sees Tsvangirai as the country’s future, but have no idea when that future will come, it seems to me that  supporting him, and trusting his judgment, is a pretty reasonable first step, even if it seems risky to do so.

 

Author

Derek Catsam

Derek Catsam is a Professor of history and Kathlyn Cosper Dunagan Professor in the Humanities at the University of Texas of the Permian Basin. He is also Senior Research Associate at Rhodes University. Derek writes about race and politics in the United States and Africa, sports, and terrorism. He is currently working on books on bus boycotts in the United States and South Africa in the 1940s and 1950s and on the 1981 South African Springbok rugby team's tour to the US. He is the author of three books, dozens of scholarly articles and reviews, and has published widely on current affairs in African, American, and European publications. He has lived, worked, and travelled extensively throughout southern Africa. He writes about politics, sports, travel, pop culture, and just about anything else that comes to mind.

Areas of Focus:
Africa; Zimbabwe; South Africa; Apartheid

Contact