Foreign Policy Blogs

Danish Defense Intelligence Agency Warns of Diplomatic Riffs

The Danish Defense Intelligence Agency (Forsvarets Efterretningstjeneste) released an intelligence risk assessment on September 1 warning of possible diplomatic conflicts in the Arctic arising due to disputes over territory and resources.

The assessment can be found on the FE’s website here (in Danish). Page 20 is devoted to the Arctic.

The FE’s main conclusion in regards to the Arctic can be summarized as follows (translated from the Danish):

  1. Firstly, climate change will lead to increased strategic interest in the Arctic’s energy resources and shipping routes.
  2. Secondly, growing demand for oil will cause tensions as countries attempt to control the resources around the Arctic. The Northern Sea Route will also increase in popularity, as the route will reduce shipping times and costs. In turn, this will augment the possibility of minor clashes and diplomatic crises between the coastal states in the Arctic region (Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia, and the United States) in the medium to long term as countries’ strategic and energy policies rub up against each other. Conversely, military conflicts will most likely not transpire.
  3. The types of conflicts the FE does envision are military harassment of other countries’ forces and exploitation of resources in disputed areas.
  4. More countries will turn to the United Nations Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf as a forum in which to work out Arctic disputes, putting a heavier burden on an already backlogged body.
  5. Russia’s apparent Arctic expansionism, along with its willingness and capability to use military power, could pose a problem to the other Arctic states.

In the end, it doesn’t seem like the Danish assessment offers a particularly groundbreaking view of Arctic foreign relations. Of course, this is a report meant for the public, so any sensitive information would remain under wraps. Still, the report does bring up one point not often noted, and that is in regards to the UNCLCS. Already, the commission lacks enough staff members to wade through all of the claims. The body doesn’t just deal with claims pertaining to the Arctic, as its main job is to rule on the submissions of every country that has ratified UNCLOS and believes it has a valid claim to some territory outside of its 200 mile EEZ. As the Arctic becomes an ever more contested area, the UNCLCS will have to act quickly to resolve diplomatic disputes.

Denmark is also participating in the rush to arms. In July, the military issued a position paper stating that it is looking to enhance its Arctic strength. The paper suggested creating a northern force with army, navy, and air force capabilities. Thus, Russia might not be the only antagonistic force in the Arctic, though Denmark might prefer to see it that way. [1]

Links

[1] Arctic Blog, “Denmark plans on increasing Arctic presence”

 

Author

Mia Bennett

Mia Bennett is pursuing a PhD in Geography at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). She received her MPhil (with Distinction) in Polar Studies from the University of Cambridge's Scott Polar Research Institute, where she was a Gates Scholar.

Mia examines how climate change is reshaping the geopolitics of the Arctic through an investigation of scientific endeavors, transportation and trade networks, governance, and natural resource development. Her masters dissertation investigated the extent of an Asian-Arctic region, focusing on the activities of Korea, China, and Japan in the circumpolar north. Mia's work has appeared in ReNew Canada, Water Canada, FACTA, and Baltic Rim Economies, among other publications.

She speaks French, Swedish, and is learning Russian.

Follow her on Twitter @miageografia