Foreign Policy Blogs

Election Shenanigans in Equatorial Guinea

I always wonder why despots and tyrants and authoritarians don’t realize that holding farce elections in which they win more than 90% of the popular vote actually serves to undermine their legitimacy. Granted, they don’t care — not caring what others think is sort of their thing, which explains why they are authoritarians to begin with. Still, does Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo really think he is fooling anyone by claiming victory with almost 97% of the vote in Equatorial Guinea? Even if he did somehow garner that share of votes it might almost have been better for him to have cooked the books the other way, claiming 75% of the total. At least then the election does not come across as a complete farce. Although Obiang claimed in this election that he would surpass the 97.1% that he garnered in 2002, so perhaps this is what qualifies as humility in the annals of corrupt elections.  Obiang’s been in office since 1979. He will not leave until death’s final election tally comes with no recount available.

 

Author

Derek Catsam

Derek Catsam is a Professor of history and Kathlyn Cosper Dunagan Professor in the Humanities at the University of Texas of the Permian Basin. He is also Senior Research Associate at Rhodes University. Derek writes about race and politics in the United States and Africa, sports, and terrorism. He is currently working on books on bus boycotts in the United States and South Africa in the 1940s and 1950s and on the 1981 South African Springbok rugby team's tour to the US. He is the author of three books, dozens of scholarly articles and reviews, and has published widely on current affairs in African, American, and European publications. He has lived, worked, and travelled extensively throughout southern Africa. He writes about politics, sports, travel, pop culture, and just about anything else that comes to mind.

Areas of Focus:
Africa; Zimbabwe; South Africa; Apartheid

Contact